<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for elmphoto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Photography chat and techniques from elmphoto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:20:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s not about the camera. Or is it? by John Picton</title>
		<link>http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/2011/07/its-not-about-the-camera-or-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>John Picton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/?p=702#comment-495</guid>
		<description>&quot;You must have a good camera!&quot; Oooh don&#039;t get me started on that one!

Honestly, I&#039;ve seen the most amazing images taken on a £20 Holga, and some absolute rubbish knocked out of a five grand Hasselblad. I don&#039;t think that equipment is that important in the grand scheme of things. If you don&#039;t have an understanding of light and a little knowledge to get the basics right then the extra quality of the kit is in effect nulled.

If you do know what you are doing though then that&#039;s a different story!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You must have a good camera!&#8221; Oooh don&#8217;t get me started on that one!</p>
<p>Honestly, I&#8217;ve seen the most amazing images taken on a £20 Holga, and some absolute rubbish knocked out of a five grand Hasselblad. I don&#8217;t think that equipment is that important in the grand scheme of things. If you don&#8217;t have an understanding of light and a little knowledge to get the basics right then the extra quality of the kit is in effect nulled.</p>
<p>If you do know what you are doing though then that&#8217;s a different story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s not about the camera. Or is it? by John</title>
		<link>http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/2011/07/its-not-about-the-camera-or-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/?p=702#comment-494</guid>
		<description>An interesting read John and some very valid points.  From a slightly different angle it always makes me smile when someone says &quot;&quot;You must have a really good camera!!&quot;  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting read John and some very valid points.  From a slightly different angle it always makes me smile when someone says &#8220;&#8221;You must have a really good camera!!&#8221;  <img src='http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I choose dynamic range over megapixels. by John Picton</title>
		<link>http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/2010/02/why-i-choose-dynamic-range-over-megapixels/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>John Picton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/?p=12#comment-191</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re using Photoshop or Lightroom (so the Adobe RAW convertor) then highlight recovery is quite remarkable. Apple&#039;s &#039;Aperture&#039; though doesn&#039;t handle it half as well, not even the latest version 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re using Photoshop or Lightroom (so the Adobe RAW convertor) then highlight recovery is quite remarkable. Apple&#8217;s &#8216;Aperture&#8217; though doesn&#8217;t handle it half as well, not even the latest version 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I choose dynamic range over megapixels. by Wedding photographers in Surrey</title>
		<link>http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/2010/02/why-i-choose-dynamic-range-over-megapixels/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedding photographers in Surrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/?p=12#comment-190</guid>
		<description>The D700 is more than adequate in low light so it&#039;s rare that I&#039;d need it for that, but the D90 performs relatively well in that area.  I also do a lot of stuff on a white background, I can imagine it would do wonders for skin tone and colour.  To be honest I think I&#039;m pretty much sold on it already, especially seeing the highlight recovery in your second example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The D700 is more than adequate in low light so it&#8217;s rare that I&#8217;d need it for that, but the D90 performs relatively well in that area.  I also do a lot of stuff on a white background, I can imagine it would do wonders for skin tone and colour.  To be honest I think I&#8217;m pretty much sold on it already, especially seeing the highlight recovery in your second example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I choose dynamic range over megapixels. by John Picton</title>
		<link>http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/2010/02/why-i-choose-dynamic-range-over-megapixels/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>John Picton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/?p=12#comment-189</guid>
		<description>High ISO isn&#039;t bad at all, it&#039;s not so much noise that&#039;s the issue but perhaps softness of the image. Colour rendition is accurate all the way to ISO 3200 though. Personally I like to keep it below ISO 1000 if I can, and with the type of photography I do this is usually not a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High ISO isn&#8217;t bad at all, it&#8217;s not so much noise that&#8217;s the issue but perhaps softness of the image. Colour rendition is accurate all the way to ISO 3200 though. Personally I like to keep it below ISO 1000 if I can, and with the type of photography I do this is usually not a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I choose dynamic range over megapixels. by Wedding photographers in Surrey</title>
		<link>http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/2010/02/why-i-choose-dynamic-range-over-megapixels/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedding photographers in Surrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 19:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elmphoto.co.uk/blog/?p=12#comment-188</guid>
		<description>This is very interesting, I&#039;ve been wrestling over trading my D90 for the S5 Pro for a while now to be my backup for my D700, everything points to me doing so but the high ISO performance apparently isn&#039;t that great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting, I&#8217;ve been wrestling over trading my D90 for the S5 Pro for a while now to be my backup for my D700, everything points to me doing so but the high ISO performance apparently isn&#8217;t that great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

